DC Court of Appeals rules against Trump in record fight

A federal appeals court panel has ruled against the former president Donald Trump As he tries to stop the National Archives from holding his white House Records being sought by the House 6 January Committee.

Panel of three federal judges – two appointed Barack Obama And one by Biden on the powerful US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia – unanimously upheld a lower court’s ruling that denied a preliminary injunction preventing Trump from releasing the records.

A separate administrative injunction pending a court battle is to be dissolved within 14 days, unless the US Supreme Court agrees to take the case.

The opinion, written by Obama-appointed Judge Patricia Millett, said there was no ground to overturn the president. Joe Bidenposition that he shall not exercise executive privileges to keep the documents sealed.

An Appeals Court panel ruled against former President Donald Trump as he tries to block the National Archives from handing over his White House records to Congress

The panel wrote, “On the record before us, former President Trump has given no grounds for this Court to override President Biden’s decision and has worked out settlement and accommodation between the political branches on these documents.”

Millett’s opinion framed the question as one of whether the court could ‘override’ Biden’s determination at Trump’s request.

She wrote that Trump’s lawyers failed to demonstrate a likelihood of being successful in obtaining the injunction.

Rai cites ‘Mr. Trump’s failure even to allege, to demonstrate any damages that would arise from disclosure, any specific and superseding interest in the confidentiality associated with these particular documents, lack of relevance, or documents Any other reasonable justification for withdrawing it.’

Trump sues Select Committee Chairman Benny Thompson, D-Miss, arguing against President Joe Biden's decision to waive any privileges on documents

Trump sues Select Committee Chairman Benny Thompson, D-Miss, arguing against President Joe Biden’s decision to waive any privileges on documents

The unanimous order came from a three-judge panel in the US Court of Appeals

The unanimous order came from a three-judge panel in the US Court of Appeals

Case may end in Supreme Court

Case may end in Supreme Court

Trump sued House 6th Committee Chairman Rep. Benny Thompson (D-Miss) over requests for documents following requests for information held in the archives.

‘Both branches agree that there is a unique legislative requirement to these documents and that they are directly relevant to the Committee’s investigation into the attack on the legislative branch and its constitutional role in the peaceful transfer of power.’

The House Select Committee on January 6, headed by Thompson, is investigating the Capitol riots. It has sought a slew of documents, including White House logs, images, documents and internal communications, as part of its investigation.

Panel member Representative Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) has said she has interviewed 300 witnesses.

The ruling, Millett noted, involved a subset of documents where Biden ‘clearly determined that it is not appropriate to claim a claim of executive privilege to withdraw documents from the January 6 committee’.

Given the “unique and extraordinary circumstances” of the riots, Biden claimed a privilege that was “not in the best interest of the United States”.

The legal setback for Trump came when some key witnesses refused to speak to the committee.

Former chief White House strategist Steve Bannon has a summer court date after being charged with contempt of Congress for failing to comply with a subpoena. Former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows said this week he would not testify, and would face his possible contempt vote in the House.

Kash Patel, a former top Pentagon official, testified on Thursday.

He said in a statement: ‘I have always been willing and able to share, with the Committee and the American people, the truth about the events of January 6—including the Defense Department’s preparedness and response to the unrest at the Capitol. Without prior contact with the committee, I learned of the summons through the media, and later received violent threatening messages that were reported to the FBI.’

‘Although I had major concerns about the fairness of the proceedings, I answered the questions to the best of my ability. The DoD inspector general under the Biden administration found no wrongdoing in his report on January 6, as I shared with the committee,’ he said.

Rai offers a scathing assessment of the events leading up to the case.

On November 3, 2020, Americans elected Joseph Biden as President, giving him 306 Electoral College votes. Then-President Trump, however, refused to accept the claim, claiming that the election was “rigged” and characterized by “tremendous voter fraud and irregularities,” it says.

‘Over the next several weeks, President Trump and his allies filed a series of lawsuits challenging the results of the election … the courts rejected all genuine claims of voter fraud that were raised.’

,