Owen Paterson, an influential Conservative backbencher and former cabinet minister, was facing a 30-day suspension after being accused of “serious” violations of lobbying rules.
Patterson sent several emails on behalf of the two companies to government officials that he had been paid a salary of £100,000 ($136,000) as a consultant between them. Patterson claims he was expressing concern about the quality of the milk and pork; Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Catherine Stone disagrees.
On Wednesday, Patterson persuaded Johnson’s government to support an amendment that would nullify his suspension and instead refer the matter to a newly set-up parliamentary committee of lawmakers headed by one of his Conservative aides, John Whittingdale. will send to
The backlash was so severe that the government appeared to be taking a U-turn on Thursday morning, indicating that proposals to end the suspension on Patterson would not go ahead.
A Downing Street spokesman said in a statement: “There must be a strict and robust investigation against for-profit lobbying. There must be a proper process to investigate and – if necessary – discipline those who do not follow the rules.” “
“I stand that I am completely innocent of what I have been accused of and that I have acted in the interest of public health and safety at all times.”
Downing Street has yet to respond to Starmer’s criticism.
Prime Ministers are given £30,000 ($41,000) per year in public funding to renovate their official residence during their tenure, but Johnson reportedly costs £200,000 ($280,000). He has been accused of trying to pay Conservative donors for work, a plan his former adviser Dominic Cummings called “immoral, unwise, (and) possibly illegal”. Johnson has denied any wrongdoing.
Johnson is also accused of trying to get the top job at the Conservative-friendly, right-wing former newspaper editor, Paul Duckray, at Ofcom, Britain’s media regulator.
The government has appointed a lobbyist with very close links to the Conservative Party as the senior external interviewer for the job, in what is seen as an attempt to ease the way for Dakre.
Disappointingly for the opposition Labor Party, these scandals do not necessarily translate into public condemnation of the government. While Starmer is correct in his claim that, for some, Johnson’s name is synonymous with sledge, other voters have accused a certain amount of scandal in this prime minister.
However, while it isn’t hurting Johnson right now, the sled, Ford notes, has a habit of building up over time.
“Although it may affect him. The sled is more like a corrosive fog than an immediate problem. It can become. The number of voters he won by supporting Brexit were naturally distrustful of politicians in the first place, So there may come a time when all of a sudden he is in severe pain.”
.