The top Pentagon official in charge of foreign arms sales announced Wednesday that it was leaving, a day after warning that US limits on technology sharing would allow strategic rivals to corner the market in the Middle East selling military hardware Was.
Although Heidi Grant did not mention China By name in his remarks to the association on Tuesday, he didn’t need it.
Earlier this week, the Pentagon’s first chief software officer said he resigned in protest because he could not bear to see China overtake the US.
The departures come with high tensions between Washington and Beijing, with both sides jockeying for the situation. Taiwan.
Grant’s departure was announced with a notice on the Defense Security Cooperation Agency website saying she had been “considering this transition for some time”.
But a day earlier he warned that the US needed to consider whether stopping arms sales to allies would leave the market to “strategic competitors”.
“We have to look at it and say, if we’re not there, our strategic competitiveness is going to fill the void,” she said, defense one. ‘And is it more risky than shifting our high-end technologies?’
Heidi Grant said she was stepping down as director of the Defense Security Cooperation Agency a day after warning that US arms sales policy had allowed China to gain influence in the Middle East. Nicolas Chalan said he resigned as the Pentagon’s first chief software officer because he could not see China overtake the US.
Before President Trump eased sanctions, sales of large drones were generally limited to close allies of NATO under the terms of the International Missile Technology Control Regime.
Grant, the first civilian to lead the agency, specifically referred to the controversy over arms sales to Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.
The incoming Biden administration ordered a review of the sale authorized by the Trump administration amid concerns that it is being used in Yemen, where airstrikes have been blamed for civilian deaths.
Before Trump, sales of large drones such as the MQ-9 Reaper were generally limited to close allies such as NATO members France and the UK under the terms of the International Missile Technology Control Regime.
“Our policies at the time were, we are not going to transfer that technology,” Grant said.
‘so guess what? Our strategic competitor transferred that technology, and training bases for the unmanned have a significant footprint. [drones] In Jordan, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates.
‘It could have been us, we could have been there, we could have been training and mentoring, we could have gotten that access.’
A Pentagon spokesman told DailyMail.com that his remarks were in the works before he left.
‘While she had been contemplating the transition for some time, Director Grant felt the time had come, having recently moved DSCA to the full operational capability phase of organizational transformation, of DSCA in its 50-odd years. 15 months after becoming the first DoD citizen to lead – year history,’ said Michael Howard.
The Stockholm International Peace Research Institute announced an increase in sugar sales in the region in a report earlier this year.
Although global arms sales ceased, transfers from China to Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates more than doubled from 2011-2015 to 2015-2020.
Days after Grant’s departure, it emerged another senior official had resigned over concerns that China was leapfrogging the US in military technology.
Nicolas Chalon told financial Times He left because of the slow pace of technological change in the US armed forces.
‘We have no competitive chance of fighting against China in 15 to 20 years. Right now, it’s already a complete deal; “I think it’s already over,” said Challan, who spent three years on the Pentagon’s massive effort to improve cyber security.
He said Beijing is marching towards global dominance due to its advances in artificial intelligence, cyber capabilities and machine learning.
They were more important than new hardware like the F-35 warplane, he said.
In contrast, he described cyber security in some government departments as ‘kindergarten level’.