‘Offensive.’ New York leaders react to the US Supreme Court’s decision on the state gun law | CNN


New York
CNN
,

New York leaders are condemning US Supreme Court decision Thursday to overturn a century-old state law that banned carrying a concealed gun outside the home Sarkar Kathy Hochuli The decision was described as both reckless and degrading.

“It’s outrageous,” she said on Twitter, “that at the moment of the national reckoning on gun violence, the Supreme Court has casually struck down a New York law that limits people who can carry a concealed weapon.”

The state is “closely reviewing our options — including convening a special session of the legislature,” the governor said, vowing to “keep New Yorkers safe from gun violence.”

Follow live updates: Supreme Court strikes down New York’s handgun law

The matter was brought to the fore by an NRA-backed group and two individuals. The decision could potentially allow more guns to be carried publicly and critics say the ruling will stifle sensible solutions they think could stop gun violence.

“Simply put, this Supreme Court ruling will put New Yorkers at greater risk of gun violence,” New York City Mayor Eric Adams said in his statement:,

Adams said, but the city will continue to do everything possible, including conducting a comprehensive review of our approach to defining ‘vulnerable places’ where gun carrying is prohibited, and reviewing our application process to ensure Doing that only fully qualified people can obtain a carry license. ,

“We will work together to reduce the risks that this decision will pose,” the mayor said, “as we cannot allow New York to become the Wild West.”

The law in question regulates licenses to carry a concealed handgun in public for self-defense and requires a resident to be licensed to carry a concealed pistol or revolver that shows “reasonable reason” for the permit. ” is present. But the Supreme Court struck down the law in a decision issued by a 6-3 majority, as the US continues to grapple with gun violence and mass shootings.

the officials The ruling is expected to sweep across New York StateConcerned it could ease access to guns and make gun crime more common – a sentiment echoed Thursday by the Manhattan, Brooklyn and Westchester district attorneys’ offices.

Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg criticized the decision in a statement, saying it “seriously undermines public safety not only in New York City, but across the country.”

However, Bragg said he is “committed to doing everything in my power to fight for the safety of everyone in this city.”

“New York still has some of the toughest gun laws in the country on the books,” Bragg said, “and we will continue to use these methods to hold gun violence offenders accountable.”

Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez The country’s Supreme Court also condemned the decision, calling it “a nightmare for public safety”.

“New York’s strong gun laws have saved lives for more than a century, and the Supreme Court opening the door to millions of New Yorkers carrying concealed weapons is a public safety nightmare,” he said. “The evidence is overwhelming that states with permissive gun laws have very high rates of gun deaths—from accidents to suicide, from domestic incidents to street crime.”

Westchester District Attorney Miriam E. Roca said the ruling “opens the door for other reasonable gun restrictions deemed unconstitutional.”

“Today’s ruling will make it more difficult for prosecutors in New York and across the country to keep our communities safe from gun violence,” Roca said.

New York Representative Jerry Nadler, a Democrat who represents the state’s 10th Congressional District, criticized six conservative judges who voted to overturn the state law, saying they “put New Yorkers at risk.” given” and made them “less secure”.

“With gun violence across the country, we must make our communities safer,” he said. “This decision is shameful.”

Rep. Yvette Clark, a Democrat for the 9th Congressional District, used similar language, calling the Supreme Court’s decision an “absolutely shameful decision.”

“The Supreme Court has decided that guns are more important than life in this country,” said state Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousin, much like the recent mass shootings in Buffalo, New York, where an 18-year-old K youth targeted black shopkeepers, shot 13 people, 10 died

Stewart-Cousins ​​said, “In these devastating times, as the nation grapples with mass shootings that have shaken Americans to their core, we must unite to address laws that put guns in the wrong hands.” Let it fall.” “New York will face this latest challenge to pass additional gun safety legislation.”

Across the aisle, there were Republicans from New York who praised the decision, including Rep. Alice Stefnik of the 21st Congressional District, who said the ruling was a “win for the Constitution.” An interview with Fox News,

“Today’s Supreme Court decision upholds the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms,” ​​she said in a statement issued by her office, “and to declare New York’s Second Amendment rights unconstitutional. correctly declares New York’s shameful attempt.”

Rep. Lee Zeldin, who previously represented the Congressional District, similarly portrayed the ruling as a law-abiding victory for New Yorkers whose Second Amendment rights, he said, “are under constant attack.”

and the 22nd Congressional District Rep. Claudia Tenney said the Supreme Court “finally right a wrong against all New Yorkers, affirming that no government has the right to trample on our constitutionally protected rights.”

Republican gubernatorial candidate Andrew Giuliani hailed today’s decision, saying the Supreme Court upheld the Second Amendment and “protected the rights of law-abiding New Yorkers to defend themselves.”

“The answer to violent crime lies in empowering law enforcement and not infringing on our rights as Americans,” Giuliani said.