In the train bomb fraud call case, the court criticized the charge of sedition. India News – Times of India – India Times English News

Chandigarh: Shocked by the sedition charges Haryana Police A local court in Faridabad has termed the case as “abuse of sedition law” against a youth who had promised to stop the train.
recently granted bail Anshul Agnihotri (22) Resident of Lalitpur district of UP, Faridabad Additional Sessions Judge Narender Sura It was found that section 124A (sedition) has been wrongly added in this case to enhance the offense committed by the petitioner. Agnihotri He is in custody since 3 January 2021.

“Govt. Railway Police, SHO were present at the time of argument and they said that in all such cases, FIR has been registered for the commission of an offense punishable under section 124A of Indian Penal Code And in the present case this section was added to this FIR after discussion with the higher police officers… After going through the record of the case, the Public Prosecutor failed to explain to the court how the provisions of section 124 of IPC are there in this case There was no intention on the part of the petitioner to attempt or bring in hatred or contempt or incitement to incite dissatisfaction with the Government…,” the judge said.