infamous socialite Ghislaine Maxwell Sentencing for sex trafficking will be done on June 28.
The sentencing date was set Friday afternoon by Judge Alison Nathan.
The delayed sentencing was based on the defense lawyers ruling because of recent ‘compelling’ evidence they say could overturn the trial, as well as Maxwell’s conviction.
Maxwell, 60, was convicted of facilitating the sexual abuse of minors by his former partner, Jeffrey Epstein, on 29 December. She faces 65 years in prison, which means she could spend the rest of her life behind bars.
He was convicted on five of six counts of sex trafficking – a spectacular fall for the former. London The society girl who later moved to the highest circle of New York’s social scene.
Maxwell’s lawyers called for a new trial last week after a juror revealed that she helped convict the former socialite by telling fellow jurors about her experience of sexual abuse.
Ghislaine Maxwell could spend the rest of her life behind bars after the late US financier and pedophile Jeffrey Epstein last month convicted a jury of recruiting and preparing young girls for sexual abuse.
Maxwell was found guilty of five of six counts of sex trafficking – a spectacular fall for a former London society girl who later rose to the highest echelons of New York’s social scene. Pictured: Maxwell with Epstein
Maxwell’s lawyers last week sought a new trial after juror Scotty David, 35, revealed he had helped convict the former socialite by telling fellow jurors about his experience of sexual abuse.
DailyMail.com has revealed that one juror, Scotty David, faced sexual abuse. He said he didn’t remember being asked about his own sexual history, but vaguely remembered a question on a prospective juror questionnaire involving friends or family.
Maxwell’s lawyers told the Mail on Sunday that they believe they found a third juror who had lied about the abuse, a second unnamed juror told The New York Times that had happened to her as a child. was abused.
The first juror to disclose his sexual abuse, David, said he does not remember how he answered a pre-trial question about his own sexual abuse history – casting doubt on the validity of Maxwell’s sentence – and He has asked the judge to see his answer.
They have since retained attorney Todd Spodek, who asked the court to provide a questionnaire. New York Daily News, If he is found to have intentionally lied, he could face charges of perjury.
David, 35, has claimed that he used his experience of sexual assault to impress other jurors, saying: ‘When I shared it, they were able to come to the memory aspect of sexual abuse.’
But the video published by DailyMail.com revealed that David didn’t remember being asked about his history of sexual abuse in a pre-trial questionnaire – which he did.
Judge Alison Nathan set June 28 as the sentencing date.
Court filings obtained by DailyMail.com show that the ex-Socialite’s defense team tried vigorously to ask two such questions, in an effort to weed out anyone ‘who may not be an impartial juror’. was done and that he did so in hard working conditions. Government objections.
Seeking to be tried again, Maxwell’s lawyers explained their position in a letter to the court, saying: ‘The defense requests that the court delay setting a schedule for sentencing because it is an imperative for the court to reverse Ms Maxwell’s sentence and to grant her a new trial based on the disclosures of juror 50 during deliberations. is the basis.
‘Therefore the defense opts to set a schedule for sentencing until this motion is resolved.
In addition, requiring Ms Maxwell to participate in the preparation of the pre-sentence investigation report while she awaits a decision on her motion for a new trial would adversely affect her Fifth Amendment rights (to remain silent). Right so as not to blame himself).
‘M / s. Maxwell would be forced to put him in a position not to cooperate with the Probation Department’s investigation because any statement he made for probation, and any document he provided, could be used against him in re-trial. can.
Maxwell was found guilty of three counts of sex trafficking of a minor, carrying a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, and conspiracy. He was found not guilty of enticing a minor to travel to engage in illegal sex acts.
Maxwell was indicted after a month-long trial in which prosecutors said he recruited and framed teenage girls for sexual abuse from 1994 to 2004 for Epstein.
Maxwell once had a romantic relationship with Epstein, but later became his employee at five of his residences, including a Manhattan mansion and a large estate in Palm Beach, Florida.
Epstein took his own life in Manhattan federal prison in August 2019 as he awaits trial on sex trafficking charges.
Maxwell’s attorneys argued at trial that he was made a scapegoat by federal prosecutors after his death.
Maxwell, who is said to have been Epstein’s madam as well as his one-time girlfriend, is seen posing with a pedophile in evidence photos shown in court.
Epstein took his own life in Manhattan federal prison in August 2019 as he awaits trial on sex trafficking charges
According to court documents dated January 10, the US government has now offered to drop two false charges linked to Maxwell’s claims, which stand on convictions of sex crimes, in a statement made in a separate civil trial in 2016. Each perjury charge carries a maximum prison term of five years.
The charges allege that the convicted sex trafficker lied under oath by concealing his involvement in Epstein’s crimes during a separate civil case brought against him by Prince Andrew’s accuser Virginia Giuffre.
Confirming its position in a letter to Judge Nathan, the US government said: ‘If the defendant’s post-trial motions are rejected, the government may choose to dismiss the serious perjury testimonies at the time of sentencing in the light of the victims. ready for Vital interest in avoiding the trauma of closing the case and testifying again.
Meanwhile, Prince Andrew is under serious pressure to settle with Virginia Roberts Giuffre after a New York judge refused to dismiss his case – paving the way for a box office trial in nine months to investigate claims. For he was forced to have sex with her repeatedly. She was a teenager.
The decision comes as a devastating blow to the Duke of York, who now faces a hugely expensive and reputation-disrupting court case next September until he is able to pay Giuffre with at least $5 million. doesn’t try.
If he does not want to settle, or if Giuffre declines any of the offers, Andrew is confronted by his lawyers in London in a videotaped statement that can be played in court though in line to the throne. The ninth cannot be compelled to give evidence. This being a civil suit in a different legal jurisdiction.
Additionally, he could simply ignore the case and let the court pass judgment in his absence, although this was likely to further damage his reputation.
Virginia Giuffre has long claimed she was a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and sued Maxwell for defamation in 2015 for calling her a liar.
Prince Andrew is seen with his arm around Virginia Roberts while Ghislaine Maxwell stands in the background, in a now infamous photo from early 2001
Giuffre’s lawyers asked Judge Loretta Presca on Wednesday to remove material about Epstein and Maxwell’s “sex trafficking operation” from a 2015 civil lawsuit against Maxwell, including references to eight anonymous John Doe.
Individuals are identified in court documents only as ‘non-parties 17, 53, 54, 55, 56, 73, 93 and 151’.
It is not clear whether one of them is the Duke of York. Six have opposed the ceiling.
In a letter to Judge Presca on Wednesday, Maxwell’s attorney, Laura Meninger, said her client would “leave the court to determine” whether the names should be dropped.
After careful review of the detailed objections submitted by ‘ [the eight Non-Party Does]’Ghislaine Maxwell’s lawyer has written to inform the court that she does not wish to further address those objections,’ the letter said.
‘Each listed has lawyers who have asserted their own respective privacy rights. Ms. Maxwell, therefore, leaves it to this Court to make an appropriate review in accordance with the protocol and order to seal the decided motions.’
DailyMail.com reached out to Nathan for comment.
,