French ambassador attacks Scott Morrison over submarine deal

The French ambassador exploded Scott Morrison To cancel the deal to buy 12 French submarines in an extraordinary speech set forth his country’s view of the diplomatic crisis.

Jean-Pierre Thébault accused the Australian government of ‘stabbing it in the back’ and said Mr Morrison intended to deceive France before announcing a nuclear submarine partnership with the US and UK in September.

‘Stab in the back. On 15 September, this Australian government abruptly announced the cancellation of the future submarine programme. The decision was deliberately kept secret for months, even years,’ Mr Thebault told the National Press Club in Canberra.

Jean-Pierre Thébault (pictured today) accused the Australian government of 'stabbing in the back' and said Mr Morrison intended to betray his country's longtime ally

Jean-Pierre Thébault (pictured today) accused the Australian government of ‘stabbing in the back’ and said Mr Morrison intended to betray his country’s longtime ally

Mr Thebault said Australia never consulted France about the possibility of a nuclear-powered sub and instead turned its back on its ally to announce a new AUKUS partnership.

‘The way this Australian government decided to turn its back on our serious and far-reaching partnership without ever open consultation France‘When there were countless opportunities, without sharing frankly and openly, or without looking for alternatives with France, is out of this world,’ he said.

In a highly unusual move after the deal was scrapped, the ambassador recalled to Paris explained why he thought Mr Morrison had not told President Emmanuel Macron in advance.

“Probably the reason the Australian government didn’t want to be clear was clearly explained by the prime minister on 16 September,” he said.

‘ I quote, ‘There was never any certainty for a long time and the painstaking AUKUS process would result in where we are now. And in fact, if we were unable to use this technology, the attack class submarine is the best submarine we have been able to use.

French Ambassador to Australia Jean-Pierre Thébault arrives at Sydney airport before leaving the country on 18 September

French Ambassador to Australia Jean-Pierre Thébault arrives at Sydney airport before leaving the country on 18 September

Mr Thebault explained: ‘Faced with the high uncertainties that have not ended around the possible conclusion of an alternative deal, the prospect of continuing the future submarine program was necessary. It was imperative to put us on the backburner. The deceit was intentional.’

The ambassador explained that France was furious because ‘the assault class program was always much more than a contract.’

He described the deal, which involved sharing of “one of the most classified and sensitive defense programmes”, as an “unprecedented act of faith”.

‘It was bringing our relationship with Australia to a level it had never reached before. politically and technically. Fully complements Australia and France’s historic alliance with the US,’ he said.

I respect sovereign choices. But you have to respect allies and partners. And do I think what has happened is injurious to the reputation of your country.’

Mr Morrison announced his decision to cancel the French submarine contract on 15 September at a joint press conference with Boris Johnson and Joe Biden.

Mr Morrison wants US or UK-style nuclear-powered submarines, which are faster, stealthy and longer at sea than conventional submarines, by 2040.

France was blindsided by the move and said it had been ‘stabbed in the back’.

After Mr Macron accused Mr Morrison of lying to him on Monday, the prime minister hit back, saying he would not counter ‘sledging’.

The French president claimed he was not informed of Australia’s plans to sever the defense contract until the AUKUS security agreement was revealed to the world.

But in a message leaked by Mr Morrison’s office is believed to show President Macron, the French leader wrote: ‘Should I expect good or bad news for my combined submarine ambitions?’

A strange handshake in Rome between Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (right) and French President Emmanuel Macron (left) at this week's G20 summit

A strange handshake in Rome between Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison (right) and French President Emmanuel Macron (left) at this week’s G20 summit

A secret leaked text message (pictured) shows Emmanuel Macron was warned Australia would torpedo a $90 billion submarine deal with France.

A secret leaked text message (pictured) shows Emmanuel Macron was warned Australia would torpedo a $90 billion submarine deal with France.

While Mr Morrison acknowledged that Mr Macron was not aware of talks with the US and the UK, due to their confidential nature, he says the French leader was told in early June that Australia was looking for submarines as other countries. Was consulting on options.

He denied lying to Mr Macron but Mr Thebault said the president had been ‘misled’ and it was tantamount to lying between allies.

‘Was the President lied to? Yes, it was,’ he said.

‘Perhaps there is a difference between misleading and lying. But, you know, between heads of states and governments, when you mislead a friend and ally, you lie to him.’

Mr Morrison claims France should have realized the deal was on the rocks – but Mr Thebault said it was ‘hypothetical’ and used a blatant example to show that France had been deceived.

‘It’s a fantasy. A hard fact is that still on the third of August, there were talks between the French and Australian Foreign Affairs and Defense Ministers, and they agreed on a joint communiqué.

‘It was available to the public and was widely acclaimed for its ambition. It agreed on the following sentence, “The two countries underscore the importance of a future submarine program”.

‘Do you agree to such a release when anything so large as the official backbone of your cooperation is in doubt? Maybe on Mars, but not that I know on this planet.’

Why is Australia building nuclear powered submarines?

Why Nuclear Submarine?

Nuclear submarines are powered by nuclear reactors that generate heat that creates high-pressure steam to spin turbines and power the boat’s propellers.

They can last about 20 years before needing refueling, meaning the only limit is the time the ocean supplies food.

The boats are also very quiet, making them harder for enemies to detect and they can travel at top speeds – around 40kmh – for much longer than a diesel-powered sub.

The first nuclear submarines were launched into the sea by the United States in the 1950s. They are now also in use by Russia, France, the United Kingdom, China and India.

A senior US defense official told reporters in Washington DC: ‘It will give Australia the ability to deploy their submarines basically for longer durations, they are quieter, they are capable of much more.

‘They will allow us to maintain and improve resistance in the Indo-Pacific.’

Jack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, said the nuclear submarines would significantly boost Australia’s military capability.

“They’re going to be capable of a lot more in the big, vast ocean that Australia has to deal with,” he told ABC.

Will Australia have nuclear weapons?

Scott Morrison clarified that nuclear-powered submarines would not have nuclear missiles.

Australia never produced nuclear weapons and in 1973 signed the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons which prevents non-nuclear states that do not already have nuclear weapons from developing.

Mr Morrison also said Australia has no plans to build nuclear power stations that are widely used around the world.

“But let me make it clear that Australia is not trying to acquire a nuclear weapon or establish a civilian nuclear capability,” he said.

‘And we will continue to meet all of our nuclear non-proliferation obligations.’

Are they safe?

The nuclear reactors are shielded in a separate section from the rest of the submarine to protect the crew from dangerous radiation.

The US has an excellent safety record with its nuclear-powered fleet, although the early Russian sub did suffer a few accidents that led to the death of 20 soldiers from radiation exposure between 1960 and 1985.

At the end of their 20-year lifespan, contaminated parts of nuclear reactors need to be disposed of in special waste storage cells deep underground.

Anti-nuclear campaigners say any leakage of radioactive waste could result in an environmental disaster.

Greens leader Adam Bandt called the submarines ‘floating Chernobyl’ in reference to the 1986 nuclear power plant explosion in the Soviet Union.

Why now?

Australia needs to replace six of its old Collins-class submarines.

In 2016 it signed a deal with French company Naval Group to build 12 diesel-electric Attack subs – but the parties were in dispute over the amount of building to be done in Australia.

That deal has now been torn down in favor of a nuclear-powered sub aided by the US and UK that will provide the technology to Australia.

The West is increasingly concerned about China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific, where it has made large territorial claims in the South and East China seas, clashed with Indian troops and repeatedly flew planes over Taiwan. .

Mr Morrison wants Australia to have serious defense capability to deter China from encroaching on the Pacific, and long-range nuclear submarines are just the ticket.

China has massively built up its military over the years and now has six Shang-class nuclear-powered attack submarines armed with torpedoes and cruise missiles.

.