Roe vs. Wade: Megan Rapinoe calls decision a ‘violent attack on women’s bodies’

newYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Supreme Court’s decision The reversal of Rowe vs. Wade has generated a growing number of factually incorrect, unreported responses from many prominent voices in the sports and entertainment worlds.

soccer star Megan Rapinoe Surprisingly His statement on the ruling contributed to the startling redefinition of language:

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Megan Rapinoe #15 of the United States looks on during the WNT Summer Series game against Nigeria at Q2 Stadium on June 16, 2021 in Austin, Texas.

Megan Rapinoe #15 of the United States looks on during the WNT Summer Series game against Nigeria at Q2 Stadium on June 16, 2021 in Austin, Texas.
(Brad Smith/ISI Photos/Getty Images)

“I just can’t understand how sad and how cruel this is. I think cruelty is the issue. Because it’s not pro-life in any way. This kind of thinking, or political belief, totally lacks.” With the motivation around gun laws, it comes with pro-death penalties, it’s anti-health, antenatal care, anti-baby, anti-pre-K, anti-food aid, anti-welfare , anti-education, comes with anti-maternity leave, anti-paternity leave.

“It’s not pro-life. And it’s so depressing and depressing, and obviously it’s infuriating to hear that this is why people want to end abortion rights, and end this important aspect of a woman.” want – not only health care and general basic security in this country, but her physical autonomy, and her right to liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and freedom are being attacked in this instance. And that’s incredibly disappointing.”

even if you agree to an abortion is characterized by a decision that does nothing to stop abortion As in “brutal” is absurd and objectively wrong. The court is simply returning to the ability of states to determine through law what rules their state should have.

Rapinoe also categorically believes that killing unborn children does not meet the definition of “brutal” under any circumstances and that more children being born is likely not “pro-life”.

Megan Rapinoe of the United States takes a knee before the women's bronze medal football match against Australia at the 2020 Summer Olympics, Thursday, August 5, 2021 in Kashima, Japan.

Megan Rapinoe of the United States takes a knee before the women’s bronze medal football match against Australia at the 2020 Summer Olympics, Thursday, August 5, 2021 in Kashima, Japan.
(AP Photo / Fernando Vergara)

She went on, blaming all men, with the Supreme Court interpreting the Constitution in a way that she disagrees with:

Inside the Opinion: 10 Key Quotes from Justice Alito’s Opinion Reverse Roe v. Wade

You are allowing a violent and relentless attack on the autonomy of women’s bodies, on women’s rights, on women’s minds, on our hearts, on our souls,’ Rapinoe said in her message to men, of a monolith. As in, what will happen. ‘We live in a country that always tries to do what’ you enabled, on you You have been privileged enough to feel your whole life.

The fact that this type of rhetoric is encouraged and promoted by media reports celebrating his bravery and “emotional response” is outrageous and unforgivable.

Beyond the ridiculous exaggeration that anyone who disagrees with his stance is “brutally” pro, he engages in the same hypocrisy we commonly see from people who share his ideology.

According to Rapinoe, there are attacks on her body and those of other women, but as Katie Pavlich subtly points out, she would have no answer if asked to explain what a woman really is:

Women for Rapinoe are tools that can be used and discarded as needed. When it suits her needs, she is a fierce advocate for women’s rights determined to be. However, when it comes to the fundamentals of biology and fairness in competition, she is more than happy to debunk them.

None of this is about protecting women’s rights, it’s about political stances. Rapinoe’s ideology demands that he engage in the unavoidable hypocrisy of claiming to care for women despite being unable to define them. And he is more than happy to oblige.

To her, this is by no means a “violent and persistent assault on the autonomy of women’s bodies” when biological males transition, compete in female leagues and physically dominate their opponents.

Arguing that the Supreme Court ruling is an attack on women’s bodies is far less persuasive when you can’t even agree on what a woman’s body really is.

Activists reach the Supreme Court on Friday, June 24, 2022, following the overturning of Roe v. Wade.  (Fox News Digital/Lisa Benaton)

Activists reach the Supreme Court on Friday, June 24, 2022, following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. (Fox News Digital/Lisa Benaton)

Click here to get Fox News App

Whether you think the Court’s decision was fair or not, Rapinoe’s brand of misogynistic, hypocritical activism is another example of the absurd contradictions at the heart of modern progressive ideology.